Volume 30, Issue 3 (Autumn 2025)
JEPR 2025, 30(3): 0-0 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ansari M, Shojaei M. (2025). Multiple Exchange Rate Regimes and Import Distortions: Micro Evidence from Iran. JEPR. 30(3),
URL: http://eprj.ir/article-1-2390-en.html
URL: http://eprj.ir/article-1-2390-en.html
1- Assistant Professor, Graduate School of Management and Economics, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author). , mahdi.ansari@sharif.edu
2- M.S. in Economics, Graduate School of Management and Economics, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
2- M.S. in Economics, Graduate School of Management and Economics, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (479 Views)
Multiple exchange rate regimes, still in place in dozens of emerging markets, distort imports and resource allocation by creating a gap between the official and market exchange rates. This paper uses Iran’s Customs data at the HS8 product level and monthly frequency from 2011 to 2023 to examine the effects of this policy structure. A detailed timeline of products eligible for subsidized exchange rates is constructed. The average effects of the policy are estimated using OLS regressions with product and time fixed effects, while heterogeneous effects across product groups are identified using a parallel generalized synthetic control approach. The findings show that a widening exchange rate gap, typically driven by an increase in the market rate, significantly raises imports of goods eligible for subsidized rates. This elasticity is larger for goods receiving greater subsidies and for intermediate products. However, the synthetic control results indicate that these effects are statistically significant only for a limited number of product categories. This paper provides the first micro-level evidence on how multiple exchange rate regimes shape the quantity and composition of imports.
Keywords: Multiple Exchange Rate, Exchange Rate Gap, Fixed-Effects Regression, Generalized Synthetic Control, Import Composition
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
business and international finance
Received: Oct 24 2025 | Accepted: Dec 28 2025 | ePublished: May 23 2026
Received: Oct 24 2025 | Accepted: Dec 28 2025 | ePublished: May 23 2026
References
1. Abadie, A. (2021). Using synthetic controls: Feasibility, data requirements, and methodological aspects. Journal of Economic Literature, 59(2), 391-425. [DOI:10.1257/jel.20191450]
2. Abadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2010). Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California's tobacco control program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(490), 493-505. [DOI:10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08746]
4. Abadie, A., & Gardeazabal, J. (2003). The economic costs of conflict: A case study of the Basque Country. American Economic Review, 93(1), 113-132. [DOI:10.1257/000282803321455188]
6. Athey, S., & Imbens, G. W. (2006). Identification and inference in nonlinear difference-in-differences models. Econometrica, 74(2), 431-497. [DOI:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00668.x]
8. Bai, J. (2009). Panel data models with interactive fixed effects. Econometrica, 77(4), 1229-1279. [DOI:10.3982/ECTA6135]
9. Bellemare, M. F., & Wichman, C. J. (2020). Elasticities and the inverse hyperbolic sine transformation. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 82(1), 50-61. [DOI:10.1111/obes.12325]
10. Burbidge, J. B., Magee, L., & Robb, A. L. (1988). Alternative transformations to handle extreme values of the dependent variable. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(401), 123-127. [DOI:10.2307/2288929]
11. Chen, & Feng, J. (2023). Group-heterogeneous changes-in-changes and distributional synthetic controls. Papers 2307.15313, arXiv.org.
13. Chong, A., & Srebot, C. (2020). Investment confidence and regional trade agreements with the United States. International Economics, 163, 92-100. [DOI:10.1016/j.inteco.2020.05.001]
14. Chotigeat, T., & Theerathorn, P. (1996). Cointegration: Black market and official exchange rates in nine Pacific Basin countries. Journal of Economic Development, 21(1), 61-92. [DOI:10.1080/09603100050031480]
15. Dutton, J. (1994). Welfare-enhancing import subsidies. Journal of Economic Integration, 9(4), 444-470. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23000456 [DOI:10.11130/jei.1994.9.4.444]
16. Feenstra, R. C., & Hong, C. (2020). China's import demand for agricultural products: The impact of the Phase One trade agreement. NBER Working Papers, 27383. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [DOI:10.1111/roie.12568]
17. Gobillon, L., & Magnac, T. (2016). Regional policy evaluation: Interactive fixed effects and synthetic controls. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(3), 535-551. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24917033 [DOI:10.1162/REST_a_00537]
18. Greenwood, J., & Kimbrough, K. P. (1987). Foreign exchange controls in a black market economy. Journal of Development Economics, 26(1), 129-143. [DOI:10.1016/0304-3878(87)90055-1]
19. Gulotty, R., & Kronick, D. (2022). The arbitrage lobby: Theory and evidence on dual exchange rates. International Organization, 76(1), 105-125. [DOI:10.1017/S002081832100031X]
21. Gunsilius, F. (2023). Distributional synthetic controls. Econometrica, 91(3), 1105-1117. [DOI:10.3982/ECTA18260]
22. Ilzetzki, E., Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2019). Exchange arrangements entering the twenty-first century: Which anchor will hold? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(2), 599-646. [DOI:10.1093/qje/qjy033]
23. Kiguel, M., & O'Connell, S. A. (1995). Parallel exchange rates in developing countries. The World Bank Research Observer, 10(1), 21-52. [DOI:10.1093/wbro/10.1.21]
25. Li, X., & Song, J. (2023). Regime-dependent dynamics of parallel and official exchange rates: Evidence from China. Applied Economics, 56(41), 4952-4973. [DOI:10.1080/00036846.2023.2227418]
26. McCalman, P. (2023). Robust trade policy to offset foreign market power. European Economic Review, 154, 104434. [DOI:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104434]
28. Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2002). The modern history of exchange rate arrangements: A reinterpretation. NBER Working Papers, 8963. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [DOI:10.3386/w8963]
29. https://rogoff.scholars.harvard.edu/sites/g/files/omnuum5901/files/rogoff/files/51_qje2004.pdf
30. Schmitt-Grohé, S., & Uribe, M. (2023). Exchange controls as a fiscal instrument. NBER Working Papers, 31294. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w31294/w31294.pdf [DOI:10.3386/w31294]
31. Seighalani S, Jalali-Naini S A, Khiabani N. (2022). External Shocks, Exchange Rate Changes, and Intermediate Goods: Explanation of Stagflation in Iranian Economy. JEPR. 27(2), 3-50. [DOI:10.52547/jpbud.27.2.3]
32. Wang, C. (2024). Counterfactual and synthetic control method: Causal inference with instrumented principal component analysis. arXiv.
34. Xu, Y. (2017). Generalized synthetic control method: Causal inference with interactive fixed effects models. Political Analysis, 25(1), 57-76. [DOI:10.1017/pan.2016.2]
| Rights and permissions | |
.jpg) |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
